----- Original Message ----- From: "Mladen Turk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I also see no reason why the mod_proxy functionally cannot be implemented in >mod_jk2 :). yes, but it is rocket science to actually get jk2 compiled and configured and to work properly. mod_proxy is part of the core, and takes about 5 seconds to setup. That is the biggest difference the current user base is experiencing today. I've been on three commercial projects where mod_jk2 has been dropped and replaced with mod_proxy, (and not on my recommendation). That alone speaks for itself. If the successor of jk2 can be as easy to configure and setup with apache, then go for it. Otherwise I humble suggestion would be to start looking that direction. Filip --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
