<spec-quote version="servlet 2.4" section="14.2.22">
Sets the preferred buffer size for the body of the response. The servlet
container will use a buffer at least as large as the size requested. The
actual buffer size used can be found using getBufferSize.
</spec-quote>
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lenny Marks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 3:31 PM
Subject: Tomcat 5; can't set response bufferSize < 8K
> It seams it is impossible to set the response buffer
> size(response.setBufferSize) with anything less than 8K. That is,
> response.getBufferSize() still returns 8K. Anything over 8K does work.
> I downloaded the source and pinned it down to the following:
>
> In org.apache.coyote.tomcat5.CoyoteResponse an outputBuffer is
> initialized with 'new OutputBuffer()'. The default constructor of
> OutputBuffer then internally creates a new ByteChunk with a 'limit' of
> DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE, which is 8K.
>
> In CoyoteResponse setBufferSize is:
>
> public void setBufferSize(int size) {
>
> if (isCommitted() || !outputBuffer.isNew())
> throw new IllegalStateException
> (sm.getString("coyoteResponse.setBufferSize.ise"));
>
> outputBuffer.setBufferSize(size);
> }
>
> and OutputBuffer.setBufferSize is:
>
> public void setBufferSize(int size) {
> if (size > bb.getLimit()) {// ??????
> bb.setLimit(size);
> }
> }
>
> The result is that the buffer size can never be set less than
> OutputBuffer.DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE or 8K.
>
> Is there any good reason for this? The question marks make me wonder.
> For now I just changed the DEFAULT_BUFFER_SIZE to 1K. Also, I'm not
> sure how this is related to bufferSize and socketBuffer for the HTTP1.1
> Connector. I sounds like bufferSize is related to reading the request.
> Should it be that socketBuffer is the default bufferSize for a response?
>
> BTW, I had done a lot of searching on this issue. I didn't find any
> related bugs or postings on the Tomcat mailing lists. I had come across
> one or two postings on various other lists from people having the same
> problem, but the threads were never answered. I myself, am new to this
> list.
>
> Thanks in advance for any advice,
> -lenny
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
This message is intended only for the use of the person(s) listed above as the
intended recipient(s), and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and
CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not read, copy, or
distribute this message or any attachment. If you received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and then delete all copies of this
message and any attachments.
In addition you should be aware that ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail sent through the
Internet is not secure. Do not send confidential or sensitive information, such as
social security numbers, account numbers, personal identification numbers and
passwords, to us via ordinary (unencrypted) e-mail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
