Hi Yoav, thanks for the release documentation. Do you mind if I check this in to jt-4.0? I think it would be very helpful.
I am aware that 5.0 uses "significantly different code" which is in itself a good reason for continuing maintenance releases of 4.1. Backporting patches would be a nice side-improvement if it were done, but I think there have been enough fixes to 4.1 itself to warrant a new release without said backports. >From a procedural standpoint, it is my understanding that the only vote needed is one to label a rc (ie beta or stable). Is that correct? If so, I'd like to be the 4.1.31 RM and I will go to work on syncing the release notes and get an rc out this weekend. Keith -----Original Message----- From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 20, 2004 10:44 AM To: Tomcat Developers List Subject: RE: Where's 4.1.31? Hi, The process is already somewhat documented. For example, http://cvs.apache.org/~yoavs/tomcatReleaseManager.html is my personal notes, and http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/releases/ is mostly Jakarta-general, not specific to Commons. It deviates from the process you posted in that we usually label a release alpha or beta, leave it out in the "wild" for a bit to give users a chance to use it, and then call it stable (with a new announcement). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
