Hi,
There are some entries on the FAQ (Misc section I think is where I put it), but it's 
far from complete.  No one wants to give out details, it's all 
confidential/proprietary/security-constrained information.

Yoav Shapira
Millennium Research Informatics


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Gaurav Vaish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 12:20 AM
>To: Tomcat Developers List
>Subject: Re: Tomcat Benchmarking / Load Testing
>
>Hi Rémy,
>
>  Thanks for your response.
>
>  In anycase, is there a list of people / companies using Tomcat
>(standalone or with Apache)?
>
>
>
>Happy Hacking,
>Gaurav Vaish
>http://gallery.mastergaurav.net
>--------------------------------------
>
>
>On Mon, 30 Aug 2004 23:51:22 +0200, Remy Maucherat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Gaurav Vaish wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >  I am looking for some good case-study on Tomcat loadtest and
>benchmarking.
>> >
>> >  It may or may not be with mod_jk(2) however a study with the
>> >following paramters would be useful:
>> >
>> >  - JDK Version
>> >  - Tomcat version
>> >  - OS (with version and SPs)
>> >  - Apache Version (if not standalone)
>> >  - Concurrent Users (Threads)
>> >  - Response Time
>> >
>> >  The problem is that we have a e-Learning application running on
>> >Tomcat 4.x (planning to migrate to 5.x) which faced severe problems
>> >when put on production server. Stress testing in labs were passed
>> >gracefully, however it gives several issues with around 500 concurrent
>> >users on the production server.
>> >
>> >  In anycase, which would be more scalable (load) - standalone Tomcat
>> >or with Apache/mod_jk?
>> >
>> >
>> >   The details of the production server are:
>> >
>> >  - Red Hat Enterprise Server 9.0
>> >  - Kernel 2.4.9
>> >  - JDK 1.4.2 (Sun JDK)
>> >  - Tomcat 4.0 (Standalone)
>> >  - 2048MB RAM
>> >  - 4-Processor CPU (2GHz each), Intel 386
>> >
>> >
>> Tomcat 5.0 is faster than 4.1 which is faster than 4.0, but we don't
>> have any numbers to give you.
>> Feel free to contribute results.
>>
>> Rémy
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and 
may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged.  This 
e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be 
saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else.  If you are not the(an) 
intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system 
and notify the sender.  Thank you.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to