DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32480>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32480 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-12-02 00:52 ------- Actually, in my real-world case I am using two include files. (There is a header include and a footer include, and those contain the tags in question along with some other application-specific init/cleanup stuff.) I simplified it for the bug report to make the test case less complex. But the spec as quoted is pretty unambiguous -- even though what we're doing is working perfectly well in our other containers, we want our JSPs to be portable, so I'll think of some way to restructure our code to get the tags out of the include files. Thanks for the quick followup on this. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
