Noel just searched on .html files, there's also:

There's also:

tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-B2.txt:       
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-B3.txt:       
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-B4.txt:       
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-B5.txt:       
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-B6.txt:       
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-B7.txt:       
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-RC1.txt:       
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.0-RC2.txt:       
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.0.txt:       
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.0.txt:   
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3509
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-NOTES-4.0.txt:   
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3534
tomcat-4.0/jakarta-tomcat-4.0/RELEASE-PLAN-4.0.txt: 
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/

or you could remove tomcat-4.0 :)

Hen

On Sat, 01 Jan 2005 13:04:04 +0000, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Happy new year all.
> 
> I have fixed the remianing issues in the jakarta-tomcta-site module
> (just need to update the live site) but I have a question about the
> tomcat-docs that are taken from the releases.
> 
> What policy do we following for updating the on-line docs? Do they reflect:
> 
> - the latest stable release
> - the latest release
> - usually the latest release but can be updated from CVS HEAD if necessary
> - something else
> 
> One further question for Remy/Yoav:
> 
> - tomcat-4.1-doc is symlinked to tomcat-4.1-doc-v4.1.31 but
> tomcat-5.0-doc and tomcat-5.5-doc seem to be copies rather than
> symlinks. Is there any particular reason for this? Is one way better
> than the other and if so why?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mark
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> From: Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Please review your site materials and fix any references ASAP.
> 
> As previously indicated, the machine name "nagoya" is going away in very
> short order.  Projects should not have any references on their web sites to
> any Apache machine names, only to domains such as issues, mail-archives,
> etc.  Sites still referencing nagoya.apache.org will break.  Unfortunately,
> due to the fragile nature of eyebrowse URLs, all of those URLs will break
> regardless of domain name.
> 
> To make lives easier, I have located all current references to nagoya on the
> ASF web-sites.  They are located in
> http://www.apache.org/~noel/nagoya-references.txt.  If you are receiving
> this e-mail, your project is on the list.
> 
>         --- Noel
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to