DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33453 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-08 23:03 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > Changes to a file that make the change timestamp older instead of newer seems > like a special (if not outright wrong) use-case. I don't agree that using version control is a special or wrong use case. In fact, I think the opposite is true. Example: 1) Check out a JSP file from VC and deploy it where Tomcat can see it 2) Access the JSP file via a web browser, so it gets compiled 3) Change it locally, deploy the changed version (newer timestamp) 4) Access it via a web browser; Tomcat correctly shows the updated version. 5) Revert to an older version from VC and deploy that. 6) Access it via a web browser; Tomcat ignores the changes and shows the output of a nonexistent JSP page -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
