DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33589>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33589


[EMAIL PROTECTED] changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|enhancement                 |major
          Component|Catalina                    |Webapps:Manager
         OS/Version|All                         |Linux
           Platform|All                         |PC




------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-02-16 10:11 -------
There are 2 sorts of stop Context :

1- When you want to stop a context because it has possibly a problem, the actual
stop context is good because you want to force the stop as quickly as possible
and you don't want to wait for anything.
2- When you to stop the context because you want to install a new WAR, I'd like
my clients don't know about it. So, I'd want a "stop light" (with waiting for
running threads). The service is not interrupted because, while I install my new
WAR, mod_jk balance the requests on the other(s) tomcat. And when I am ready, I
start my context and "stop light" the others.

The 2nd case is not resolved with a reload, because, when I install my new WAR,
(in default localhost with unpackWARs="true") my context is not the new One.
So I need a stop...

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to