DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33650>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33650 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-02-19 14:00 ------- Ah ok, did not really understood it that way since I consider it is 'better to have a slow source generation than a *broken* source generation' in any situation and not just in 5.0.x :). Thus the qualification as 'enhancement'. Nonetheless, I'm still trying to understand the code. I have made little progress as I realized I needed to delta the dependencies that are added through the Compiler instance if I want to cache the includeDirective fragment. I still need to find how are the taglibs evaluated to generate the java code. At this time it looks like I could dream sort of a 10x improvement if this sort of caching can be done. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
