DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33266>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33266





------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED]  2005-03-21 11:31 -------
(In reply to comment #5)
> This is a container service. 
??? It is. So what? 

> Please do not reopen the report. If you disagree,
> it's easy to implement and use your own factory to do what you want.
I won't reopen (though I'm tempted to, as this comment will be left unanswered)
and I disagree.
Why wouldn't you like everyone to benefit from the change?
Is there any performance impact related with this? Any enormous effort on
coding? Any fundamental change in the architecture? Any violation of servlet
specs? I don't think so.

My proposal is the natural continuation of the works made on context.xml files 
placed in WAR'S META-INF subdir. It is possible to define a DataSource and
referring DataSourceRealm in such a file, but they all render *useless* without
apropriate JDBC driver. Please reconsider your rejection. And be more
descriptive in your comments if you want people be less persistent in their 
whining.



-- 
Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to