DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34227>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34227 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-03-31 11:36 ------- It becomes a little bit more rational (although it is still impossible), as you are describing a scenario which wouldn't rely on a race condition incrementing the int. If the session field becomes null, then endAccess is not going to be called. The request objects are per thread, are fully independent, and I don't see any scenario (other than the session becoming invalid, in which case there won't be any problem, of course) when the session field would become null. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]