OK, here is what I believe is the final version of the Mapper code with support for wildcard matching.
The new code is approximately 14.7% faster, executing the 1,000,000 iteration test loop in 7480 ms versus 8772.5 ms for the original code, a difference of 1292.5 ms. Times were computed by executing the main() function 10 times, and recording the results. The median value was then calculated and used for reporting. For those interested, the times for the tests are below. Here are the files: HostMap.java - New File to act as a container for hosts. It contains searching methods to find hosts. http://www.mhsoftware.com/~gsexton/HostMap.java Mapper.diff - Diff between 5.5.9 mapper and the current one. Because of the abstraction of the host mapping into a new class it's not super useful, but included for completeness. http://www.mhsoftware.com/~gsexton/Mapper.diff Mapper.java - Complete, modified Mapper.java file. http://www.mhsoftware.com/~gsexton/Mapper.java Harness_output.diff - Difference between the test harness output using the 5.5.9 code, and the modified code. http://www.mhsoftware.com/~gsexton/harness_output.diff Once I sort out the correct method of setting the default # of Alias Matches, I will submit the complete set as a diff. Unless someone else want to do the parameter setting. Right now the default # of alias matches is hard-wired to 16. Some people have asked me to integrate the test harness into a Junit testing module. Unfortunately, I don't have any experience w/ Junit, so I don't think I would be a good candidate for this. There's one final thing. During previous discussions, it was kind of hinted I should put the alias match limiting in the Connector. It seems kind of ugly since this seems to apply at the host or alias level. Does anyone have thoughts on this? For testing purposes, a P3 600 Mhz running SUSE Linux 9.2, w/ JDK 1.4.2_06-b03 was used. New Code 7477ms 7641ms 7692ms 7394ms 7395ms 7475ms 7527ms 7482ms 7480ms 7480ms Median: 7480ms 5.5.9 Mapper w/ New Test Harness 8561ms 8560ms 8771ms 8774ms 8771ms 8767ms 8860ms 8775ms 8775ms 8782ms Median: 8772.5ms George Sexton MH Software, Inc. http://www.mhsoftware.com/ Voice: 303 438 9585 > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Rossbach [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 8:40 AM > To: Tomcat Developers List > Subject: Re: Code Submission - Wild Card Aliases > > Great news, > > can you post your new code that we can test it also? > > Many thanks > Peter > > George Sexton schrieb: > > >The measurement was calculated by taking the median reading of 10 > >consecutive executions. > > > >Just for your edification they were: > > > >New Code: > > > >7373ms > >7395ms > >7383ms > >7370ms > >7384ms > >7385ms > >7395ms > >7376ms > >7378ms > >7393ms > > > >Median: 7383.5ms > > > > > >Old code: > > > >8561ms > >8560ms > >8771ms > >8774ms > >8771ms > >8767ms > >8860ms > >8775ms > >8775ms > >8782ms > > > >Median: 8772.5ms > > > >Difference: 1389ms ~ 15.8% improved > > > >My mistake for not wanting to bore the list with minutiae. > > > >George Sexton > >MH Software, Inc. > >http://www.mhsoftware.com/ > >Voice: 303 438 9585 > > > > > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >> > >> > > > > > > > >>The original code you submitted looks quite bad so I don't > trust your > >>measurements at all, sorry. > >> > >>Rémy > >> > >>------------------------------------------------------------ > --------- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
