DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34956>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34956 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-06-08 15:53 ------- I would say what Carlin describes is a different bug and is not what the original request is about. I propose to open a new bug for this. Here a clarification what this bug is about: Tomcat allows to do sth like that: a) create a own implementaion of javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest public class MyRequestImpl implements javax.servlet.http.HttpServletRequest { .... } b) use that request objectt in a forward call javax.servlet.RequestDispatcher rd = wrapper.getRequestDispatcher("somepage.jsp"); MyRequestImpl myRequest=new MyRequestImpl(); rd.forward(myRequest, response); This is against the spec, which clearly says either the original request or HttpServletRequestWrapper has to be used. You can find a real live example for this in the cocoon code. Sepcifically in org.apache.cocoon.components.jsp.JSPEngineImplNamedDispatcherInclude from cocoon 2.0.4. Thanks -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
