DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36541 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-09-08 18:10 ------- (In reply to comment #49) > I understand, but how can you guarantee that the 'second' request does not > overtake the first put request? Not very likely, agreed - but still possible. > Users have a great way at pressing F5 very quickly! That was the purpose of the second get check inside the sync block. The second request will, if the cache is null, block on the sync'd session, and only proceed into the sync block after the put. The first thing it does is check again, which returns non null and it continues happily. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
