I used mod_jserv and lately switched to mod_jk. I use servlets and jsp's.
I direct servlets and jsp to tomcat using a url prefix, i.e. the apache does
not look for the jsp type, but rather for the url prefix.
This works fine with mod_jk as well, using JkMount directive (in mod_jserv
it was ApJServMount directive).

Hope that helps

- Boaz
 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 25, 2000 05:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mod_jk apache 1.3.14 tomcat 3.2 and JSPs



-- 
Best Regards,
--raman

      
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WWW: http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/raman/             
PGP:    http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/raman/raman.asc 
Hi --


I feel that the mod_jk-howto.html and related docs may be missing a
configuration directive --at least this is my guess after playing with it
for a day and reading all the docs.

Using the config files as specified, jsp pages never make it to tomcat
--apache ends up serving them as static files.

I switched to the old mod_jserv.so and that works with
tomcat --and compairing the configuration steps -- nowhere
in the mod_jk config are we associating the jakarta-servlet
handler with the mounted URIs.
I tried mapping content-type text/jsp to jakarta-servlet (after looking up
the handler name in mod_jk.c --but that produces a 500 internal error.
Also, with log level set to debug I dont see any error messages in any of
the logs.

Reply via email to