Unless your page has no graphics at all, then all is well. However if
you do, then Tomcat would be serving them. Apache is better resource
wise for static content such as graphics as far I know. If the number of
graphics is low then, I don't see a problem. Apache supports persistent
connections. A browser could get all the graphics for a page in one
connection. Does Tomcat support this though? If not thats one conenction
for every image.
~Rob
Glen Campbell wrote:
>
> I would just like to get confirmation of this: my site will have low volume,
> and 98% of the pages will have dynamic data (JSP). I should be able to
> configure tomcat to listen on port 80, and get rid of Apache all together?
> Or is there something I'm missing that would mean I have to use Apache and
> Tomcat together?
>
> Glen
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
_______________________________________
Robert Wohleb
Web Applications Development Manager
Parafoil Software, Inc.
_______________________________________
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
