John, don't get jumpy. This is not one of your flame wars.
GNU's Not Unix. Apache's not GNU. The Apache Group is not GNU. And the GPL (Gnu Public
License) is not the Apache License.
I was just trying to educate you: not all free software is GNU. There are several
public licenses available around, and the Apache License is one of the less
restrictive ones -- while the GPL explicitly prohibits several uses. I don't have
anything against the GPL, and in fact like the FSF and their work; but Tomcat belongs
to the Apache Group.
Cheers,
Alex.
John Golubenko wrote:
> Don't worry, I've read it. Here is the copy for you, if you didn't.
> There is clearly written that you can modify the source code, and
> redistribute or use it. Just like I said in previus email, that it's
> legal to modify the source code, (file name generation) and compile it back.
> While it's still true, i don't know what are you trying to prove. And
> who said that I'm not commercial developer? Sorry, you wrong.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
