Howdy, >> You realize these numbers are meaningless to anyone except you, as we >> don't know what you're measuring, how you're measuring it, what the >> proper results / proper behavior is, etc. >No, I didn't realize my numbers meant nothing. I figured them to be >self-explanatory. The numbers supplied were there simply as evidence of >the >incremental increase of memory over time. That's all. I apologize for any >confusion.
I was unclear -- they're not evidence of anything until you explain how they're measured and what you would expect to see under "normal" conditions (or alternatively show the numbers from Solaris and Linux side by side, allowing space for JVM implementation variability). >Actually, I didn't reset them after the upgrade to Tomcat 4.1.27. I just >changed them to -Xms60m -Xmx80m. These settings suggest a minimum heap of 60MB, and a maximum heap of 80m. Is that the behavior you want? Yoav Shapira This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
