In exactly what manner was David "completely wrong"? In his identification of the bottleneck? In identifying the old connector as faster?
Or is there a fundamental mistake in his whole post? > -----Original Message----- > From: Remy Maucherat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 1:02 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Coyote Performance > > > David Morris wrote: > > > I did some profiling of a slow page (Struts based) on a > site using the > > Coyote connector. This site does not use Apache. It appeared that a > > java.net.SocketInputStream.read being invoked from > > org.apache.coyote.http11.InternalInputBuffer.parseRequestLine() was > > causing a bottleneck. In this case average response over a 5 page > > interaction with three being relatively simple and two > being complex > > averaged 35 seconds per response when repeated 20 times. > > > > I changed the site to use the old and deprecated http connector and > > performance improved to 4 seconds per response. It appears that the > > org.apache.catalina.connector.http.SocketInputStream was > much faster. > > Since Coyote is recommended, does anyone have any ideas on > how I can > > get it to perform better? Over dozens of tests, it appears > that large > > pages take a long time with the Coyote connector. > > You are of course free to use whatever you want, but I > believe you are > completely wrong ;-) > > -- > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > R�my Maucherat > Senior Developer & Consultant > JBoss Group (Europe) S�RL > xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
