I haven't done myself, but from what I've seen from other Tomcat developers that have tried gcj, you get a small improvement in start-up time, and after that, not much of an improvement over JIT.
"Oscar Carrillo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I saw this in Fedora 2 release schedule. > ---------------------------------------- > We have set a very aggressive schedule for Fedora Core 2. Red Hat > considers two items absolutely "stop-ship" -- that is, we will slip the > release if necessary to include them. These two items are the 2.6 Linux > kernel and SELinux functionality integrated into the distribution. Other > areas of technology that the Fedora Community (Red Hat and third parties > together) will focus on will include GNOME 2.6 (tight schedule, > particularly dependent on Gtk+ 2.4), KDE 3.2, more Java software using gcj > (Ant, Tomkat, Jakarta, Eclipse, but not Mozilla plugins, AWT, or Swing), > and integrating work on other architectures (at least AMD64, and possibly > also SPARC). > ---------------------------------------- > > Does anyone have any ideas on Tomcat running under gcj? Does it work well > already, and would we expect real performance benefits from it? > > Since Tomcat (Tomkat) isn't spelled correctly in the release schedule, I > don't have a lot of confidence that this means anything. > > Oscar > http://daydream.stanford.edu/tomcat/install_web_services.html --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
