Ha! I said the same thing a month ago and was completely ignored. :-\ -----Original Message----- From: Angus Mezick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 6:44 AM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Digitally Signing Posts
+1 --Angus > -----Original Message----- > From: George Sexton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 8:56 AM > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE:Digitally Signing Posts > > > Would you either > > A) Not sign posts to the group > > Or > > B) Sign the posts with a working certificate? > > Everytime I hit one of your messages, it locks my mail client > up for 30 > seconds. > > > Warning: > The Certificate Revocation List needed to verify the signing > certificate > is either unavailable or it has expired. > Signed by [EMAIL PROTECTED] using RSA/SHA1 at 12:48:09 AM > 3/16/2004. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Antonio Fiol Bonnín [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 12:48 AM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: Re: Load balancing for uptime > > > Hi, > > To keep it up, you will need to setup session replication (See your > Cluster element in server.xml), either in-memory or JDBC. Both are > supposed to work. > > However, that implies several things: > - Your session must contain Seralizable objects only. > - Your performance will be worse (how much worse highly > depends on the > size of the objects in your session) > > And... nobody guarantees that your memory leak (if there is > one) is not > related to the information stored in sessions. > > Depending on your load balancer, there is another option > (IMHO, better > for your case). > > There are some load balancers that allow you to turn a server > down while > > keeping it up for currently established sessions, for a certain time. > That allows you NOT to use session replication, thus not > replicating any > > instability related to sessions. > > Oh, and last, if you need a good consultant for fixing, optimizing or > redesigning your application, you just found one ;-) > > Yours, > > > Antonio Fiol > > > Derek Clarkson wrote: > > >Hi all, > > We have an app written in a mix of JSP, servlets and struts > across 3 > >instances of apache, tomcat and an RMI server. To say that > it's a pile > of > >smelly stuff is an understatement, however it works (mostly) and our > >customers depend on it. At least once a week though it > crashes with out > of > >memory errors. > > > >Until we can redesign and fix it we are looking for a way to keep it > up. One > >suggest has been to have two servers running with a common DB server, > and to > >use a load balancer to allow us to keep one server up whilst we boot > the > >other, then vice versa. Thus on a daily basis we can reboot both > machines > >whilst mainting a working system for the users. > > > >Can anyone see any problems with this ? I'm concerned about issue > realed to > >session management, etc. > > > >Ciao > >Derek > > > > > >_____________________________________________________________ > _________ > >This email, including attachments, is intended only for the addressee > >and may be confidential, privileged and subject to copyright. If you > >have received this email in error, please advise the sender > and delete > >it. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, > you must not > >use, copy or disclose its content to anyone. You must not copy or > >communicate to others content that is confidential or subject to > >copyright, unless you have the consent of the content owner. > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
