Mar 17, 2004 1:52:51 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke INFO: Unknown message 0 Mar 17, 2004 1:52:52 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke INFO: Unknown message 0 Mar 17, 2004 1:52:53 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke INFO: Unknown message 0 Mar 17, 2004 1:52:57 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke INFO: Unknown message 0 Mar 17, 2004 1:52:59 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke INFO: Unknown message 0 Mar 17, 2004 1:53:02 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke INFO: Unknown message 0 Mar 17, 2004 1:53:03 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke INFO: Unknown message 0 Mar 17, 2004 1:53:06 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest invoke INFO: Unknown message 0 Mar 17, 2004 1:53:11 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest decodeRequest WARNING: Error registering request Mar 17, 2004 1:53:35 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest decodeRequest WARNING: Error registering request Mar 17, 2004 1:53:37 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest decodeRequest WARNING: Error registering request Mar 17, 2004 1:53:42 PM org.apache.jk.common.HandlerRequest decodeRequest WARNING: Error registering request
PS The faq at http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/faq/connectors.html says that mod_jk is the preferred connector and that jk2 is not production quality. My understanding was that jk was in maintence mode and jk2 is considered the stable connector. Is the faq right or is it just out of date?
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]