On Wednesday 31 March 2004 15:14, Emerson Cargnin wrote:
Hi, I run apache 1.3 whit Tomcat 4.1 and i use mod_jk2. Its works fine. > Ive being researching about mod_jk and as far as I can see, the mod_jk > was made to work with apache 2 (even that it says that it works with 1.3). > > Do I have to build mod_jk again if I use jk2???? > > I have read that jk1.3 would be better suited to apache 1.3... > > What's the best connector to use with apache 1.3 and tomcat 5?? > > thanks > > Randy Harrison wrote: > > Galem, > > > > Mod_jk and mod_jk2 are connectors between tomcat and a standard > > webserver(apache, etc.). If you are going to use tomcat as a stanalone > > sever you don't need to connect to apache. > > > > Short answer = no. > > > > Randy Harrison > > Developer, eWatch Services > > PR Newswire > > 612 243-0601 x1120 > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > Galam > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Tomcat Users > > List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > cc: > > > > Subject: RE: apache 1.3 > > tomcat 5.0.19 03/17/2004 04:59 > > PM > > Please respond to > > "Tomcat Users > > List" > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Shapira, > > > > I have a question! > > > > If I use Tomcat5 standalone in production, do I still need to configure > > the mod_jk ? The mod_jk has been giving me too much troubles, and it > > would be really great if it is not needed in standalone enviroment. > > Thanks! > > > > Galam. > > > > > > > > > > "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Tomcat 5 can be used standalone to serve static content including > > images, yes. The same is true for tomcat 3 and 4 as well. People are > > using tomcat in production without a front-end server to handle static > > content, yes. Is there a drop in performance? Probably yes, but it > > depends on the static content, the traffic your site gets, the hardware > > and software configuration, and a host of other variables: frequently > > the drop in performance is better than the additional maintenance and > > setup costs of a separate front-end. > > > > Yoav Shapira > > Millennium Research Informatics > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Emerson Cargnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 2:16 PM > >>To: Tomcat Users List > >>Subject: Re: apache 1.3 tomcat 5.0.19 > >> > >>I have a complementary question, taht I know that i have being asked > >>before, but didn't find any answer, it's related to my previous > > > > question: > >>- Tomcat 5 can be used directly (in production) without apache??? For > >>serving static pages and images??? I mean, there are anybody using it > >>direct in production, without any drop in performance? > >> > >>Emerson Cargnin wrote: > >>>Hi all > >>> > >>>I'm migrating a tomcat 3.2.3 isntallation to version 5. > >>>When using 3.2.3, I used to use automatic mod_jk.conf-auto generation > >>>for use by apache. Does version 5 has the same feature? Or do I have > > > > to > > > >>>configure it by hand?? any how-to?? It's not mentioned in tomcat 5 > > > > docs.. > > > >>>I used mod_jk, is jk2 prefered???? There's no linux release for it > > > > and > > > >>>when trying to build as the readme says, the buildI doesn't work at > >> > >>all... > >> > >>>I'm using suse 9 / apache 1.3 and tomcat 5. > >> > >>-- > >>Emerson Cargnin > >>Analista de Sistemas > >>Setor de Desenvolvimento de Sistemas - TRE-SC > >>tel : (048) - 251-3700 - Ramal 3181 > >> > >> > >>--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business > > communication, and may contain information that is confidential, > > proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the > > individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, > > printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) > > intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your > > computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Mail - More reliable, more storage, less spam > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
