On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 11:05:34AM +0100, Adrian Barnett wrote: : After trying numerous different things, suspicion falls on mod_jk2. The : docs on mod_jk2 are not very helpful. Some say that mod_jk2 is better than : mod_jk and should be used in place of it, others say that mod_jk2 is not : stable enough for production use yet and mod_jk should be used instead.
Why not just try mod_jk and rerun your tests? If you don't experience a memory leak in that case, then you'll know that mod_jk2 (in its current state) isn't stable enough for your site. : Also, we are using the JNI mode of communication for mod_jk2, rather than : Unix sockets. What happens when you use sockets? -QM -- software -- http://www.brandxdev.net tech news -- http://www.RoarNetworX.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
