Hi Bill,
Thanks for the reply. A late follow up I know, but I have been thinking
about this in more detail and looking at the code again.
On Sat, May 08, 2004 at 01:03:25PM -0700, Bill Barker wrote:
> > On a related matter, if the worker list is stored in process memory, I
> > wonder if there is any merit having sticky sessions enabled? With our
> > current setting (having KeepAlive off) they would only be able to re-use
> > the AJP connection if they are (by chance) re-allocated to the same
> > apache process.
> >
>
> Well, firstly everyone gets to re-use the AJP connection. Secondly, if
> session-tracking is on and configured correctly, then the client will get
> routed to the same Tomcat instance regardless of which Apache child gets the
> next request.
I assume 'everyone' means any client who connects to the same apache process?
There is no way for apache processes to 'share' AJP connections?
Thanks
G
--
The average girl would rather have beauty than brains because she knows
that the average man can see much better than he can think.
-- Ladies' Home Journal
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
