On Friday 21 May 2004 08:53 am, Shapira, Yoav wrote: > You never answered the key question of whether your session attributes > are Serializable or not: that's a binary question, should be easy to > determine ;) >
He didn't answer it but he did mention that he wasn't concerned with maintaining state across server restsarts: >For the most part I'm only concerned with session stuff while a user is >busy editing -- it doesn't have to survive stop/start at all. I don't think his problem has to do with whether or not the objects are serializable. > Yoav Shapira > Millennium Research Informatics > > >-----Original Message----- > > From: Ben Souther [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: Friday, May 21, 2004 7:24 AM > >To: Tomcat Users List > >Subject: Re: session data in Tomcat 5 > > > >Mike, > >If you have a small, reproducable test case, send it up. I'd like to > > take > > >a > >look at it. > > > >On Friday 21 May 2004 01:10 am, you wrote: > >> Jacob Kjome wrote: > >> > I didn't see the earlier posts, but are you using Tomcat-5.0.24? > >> > There's a bug related to session cookies which requires a hotfix. > >> > However, I'd just install 5.0.25 which has the fix, plus a few > >> > others. Also note that Tomcat-5.0.24+ is very strict about objects > > in > > >> > the session being serializable (where 5.0.19 was less so). Upon > >> > application shutdown, non-serializable attributes will be removed > > so > > >> > that upon restart, the non-serializable attributes won't exist in > > the > > >> > session. Not sure if that is your problem here, but it's a good > > thing > > >> > to note. > >> > > >> > http://archive.apache.org/dist/jakarta/tomcat-5/v5.0.25-alpha/ > >> > > >> > Jake > >> > >> Well, yes and no. That is, on the remote server it is 5.0.19 but > >> locally on my laptop (Win2K) and on a Linux box (FC1) I downloaded > > and > > >> installed 5.0.24. I wrote a pair of simple test jsp's and the > > version > > >> on the Win2K machine certainly has problems as the session is > > different > > >> on every submit. The remote server and the Linux box seem better. > >> After reading your note I uninstalled the 5.0.24 version then > > downloaded > > >> and installed the 5.0.25-alpha version (the alpha part scared me > > which > > >> is why I went with the 5.0.24 before). Interestingly enough it also > >> seems to exhibit the same behaviour (new session on every submit). I > >> guess this means that all the straining and heaving to get things to > >> work on a local Tomcat 5 server before deploying them remotely was a > >> wasted day. > >> > >> For those interested, my test consisted of two simple jsp's like the > >> following one. This is second.jsp the other being first.jsp. In the > >> other jsp test is test2 and test2 is test. > >> > >> <%@ page language="java" contentType="text/html; charset=UTF-8" > >> pageEncoding="UTF-8" %> > >> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> > >> <HTML> > >> <HEAD> > >> <TITLE>second.jsp</TITLE> > >> </HEAD> > >> <BODY> > >> <P><font color="blue">Second</font></P> > >> <p>Session ID=<%=session.getId()%></p> > >> <br>test = <%=session.getAttribute("test")%> > >> <br>test2 = <%=session.getAttribute("test2")%> > >> <br> > >> <form method="post" action="first.jsp" > > >> <input type="submit"/> > >> </form> > >> <% > >> session.setAttribute("test","test"); > >> %> > >> <br>test confirm = <%=session.getAttribute("test")%> > >> </BODY> > >> </HTML> > >> > >> For the most part I'm only concerned with session stuff while a user > > is > > >> busy editing -- it doesn't have to survive stop/start at all. My > >> "feeling" right now (FWIF) after repeated deploy/undeploy on the > > three > > >> installs of Tomcat is that Tomcat 5 is certainly is not as solidly > >> stable as Tomcat 4.1. > >> > >> Mike > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business > communication, and may contain information that is confidential, > proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the > individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, > printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended > recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system > and notify the sender. Thank you. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Ben Souther F.W. Davison & Company, Inc. This e-mail message, and any accompanying documents, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure, distribution or copying is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact our office by email or by telephone at (508) 747-7261 and immediately destroy all copies of the original message. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
