Been fine up until now.
I want to limit the ram assigned to each webapp, but if this is the wrong way of doing this then I'd appreciate being told what the correct argument would be.
The only out of memory problems I had were caused by some shadiness between jk and coyote. but seems to be sorted now.
Thanks
Mark
On 1 Jun 2004, at 14:16, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Mark, This option -Xmx128m
Will cause OutOfMemory for you, As it basically sets maximum Java heap size, which will cause JVM to through whenever the limit is reached. Set it to a high value.
Chall,
-----Original Message----- From: Mark Lowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 4:55 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I have this in our startup scripts
export CATALINA_OPTS="-Djava.awt.headless=true -Xmx128m -Xdebug"
Perhaps the debug argument might reveal something. I cant be much help
on windows matters as I try not to get involved with anything like that.
My app is still running, but linux not windows so i don't know how far i
can compare. I also have no idea about compiling jk under windows, i've
always found that I've needed to compile jk often with the head version
out of cvs (there's always a fix thats needed somewhere).
Mark
On 1 Jun 2004, at 13:05, James Sherwood wrote:
Ran out of memory last night again
Set to 512m and ran out at 284m Maybe I am missing a paramater in the tomcat setup on windows or something
Frustrating
James
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Lowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 4:04 PM Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
300 mb sounds a lot, i've got a hibernate and struts flavored app running with a 128 limit, and thats being generous.
I haven't measured anything but top looks happy, with 5.0.25 with jk to apache 2.0.47. Had a bit of traffic this afternoon albeit nothing heavy, had 5 simultaneously this afternoon. But nothing huge.
Mark
On 31 May 2004, at 17:54, James Sherwood wrote:
Thanks Mark,
I have it currently running bypassing the mod_jk with rewrite to port 8080.
The memory has ramped to 327 mb so far which is not anything to worry about.
I had this problem on our linux box but I had forgotten the -server option and that took care of it. The problem is, windows doesnt accept -server.
Ill continue to monitor it with the mod_jk bypass in.
James
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Lowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 12:19 PM Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
I've just set 5.0.25 up and it will run with mod_jk/1.2.3-dev and Apache/2.0.47 , I'll see if i get the same thing happening.
When i was having problems i was getting a decoding error written to catalina log, which 5.0.24+ hasn't given me. 5.0.24 has been working quite happily but the next man mentioned a session error so
-----------------------------------------------------------------I took his word for it and upgraded.
You could have tomcat being served from an ip alias, but will depend on you configuration. And might take longer than getting jk sorted.
For the moment I can just say i'll keep and eye on things and see if the same happens to me.
Mark
On 31 May 2004, at 14:23, James Sherwood wrote:
There are no errors anywhere that I can find in any logs. The memory just slowly ramps up till an out of memory error happens.
James
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Lowe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 9:04 AM Subject: Re: Tomcat5/mod_jk Memory Leak/mod_jk bypass
What does your catalina log have to say for itself?
On 31 May 2004, at 13:59, James Sherwood wrote:
As I posted before, I get a memory leak using mod_jk 1.2 with Tomcat 5.0.25 and Apache 2.049
I beleive it may be related to the mod_jk connector and since I am not actually serving up anything with apache yet I want to just bypass the connector for 1 site and hit tomcat directly. I have to use apache for other things on the server so I cannot just use tomcat.
Any idea the best route for this? (of course a fix for the leak is the best route:) My route works but certian urls within the site do not work(although I think I could get them working).
The way I have done it is this:
<VirtualHost *>
ServerName mysite.ca
RewriteEngine on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www\.mysite\.ca$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.*) http://localhost:8080$1 [p]
</VirtualHost>
Thanks, James
-------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]-- - To unsubscribe, e-mail:-------------------------------------------------------------------For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
