I know this isn't an answer to your problem, but I've run Tomcat 5.0.19 on my Win2k3 system and it responded as fast as any of my Linux boxes. That's saying a lot considering I was running Cocoon 2 on it -- an XML publishing app that seems to eat CPU for breakfast. I didn't remove any services or disable anything to make it work either.

Do any other services on this system experience any slowness? I would suspect some network latency due to DNS lookups or something.

--David

QM wrote:

On Tue, Jul 27, 2004 at 08:53:45AM -0700, Martin, David S wrote:
: -------------------------------------
: | Test | O/S, Tomcat Ver. | Time |
: -------------------------------------
: | 1 | Linux, 5.0 | ~2 min |
: | 2 | Win2k3, 5.0 | ~20 min |
: | 3 | Win2k3, 4.1 | ~20 min |
: | 4 | Win2k, 4.1 | ~2 min |
: | 5 | Win2k, 5.0 | ~2 min |
: -------------------------------------
: : So what gives? Is there a known conflict between Tomcat 4.1/5.0 and
: Win2k3 Advanced Server?


What about general I/O under 2k3, or Java I/O?

What sort of services are running under a default 2k3 install that aren't
running under Win2k?  Does 2k3 add any extra security checks or containment
that 2k does not have?

You could also check for interactions between the JDK you used and the OS.

The JDKs are all native code deep-down. If 2k3 is running the code inside
some special "win2k emulation mode" or "protected area," that may be the
culprit.

-QM




--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to