John Villar wrote:
Try to append "amp" to the "&" fragment.... it should end like this "&" and the output would be "&"
It is my understanding that if an XML document is serialized to an output stream, characters like &, < and > are represented by their entities & > < so an XML parser can parse the document again.
Otherwise I would be ending up writing &amp;amp;amp;amp; somewhen and have to count the number of transformations in advance )-:
Regards,
Andreas
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]