wow, that just seems wrong. Have you tried other jdbc drivers? I know from first hand experience with Oracle's jdbc driver, w/o pooling it's minimum of 100ms to get connection. With pooling, it's usually less than 5ms.
peter On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:56:42 +0200, Henrik Rathje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have to correct myself: > getNumIdle() returned 19 after a little bit of waiting. > but getConnection( ) still takes 1238 miliseconds. > Henrik > > On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 18:47:46 +0200 > > > Henrik Rathje <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi, > > I tried your settings, but getNumIdle() still returns 0. > > Why that? > > The maxActive value was 0 because i thought this is neccesary to let > > the pool never run out of connections: > > http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/dbcp/configuration.html > > maxActive default:8 The maximum number of active connections that can > > be allocated from this pool at the same time, or zero for no limit. > > cheers, Henrik > > > > On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:23:40 -0400 > > "Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > Try minIdle = 19, maxIdle = 20, maxActive = 20, initialSize = 20. I > > > think the maxActive 0 effectively means no pooling. > > > > > > Yoav Shapira > > > Millennium Research Informatics > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: Henrik Rathje [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 12:20 PM > > > >To: Tomcat Users List > > > >Subject: Re: DBCP Performance? > > > > > > > >Hi, > > > >seems you are rite: > > > > > > > >org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource source = > > > >(org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource)ds; > > > > System.out.println("num of idle connections " + > > > source.getNumIdle() > > > >); > > > > System.out.println("num of max act connections " + > > > >source.getMaxActive() ); > > > > System.out.println("username " + source.getUsername() ); > > > > > > > >prints: > > > >num of idle connections 0 > > > >num of max act connections 0 > > > >username tomcat > > > > > > > >but why? here is the connection pool configuration: > > > ><Resource name="jdbc/sdb-login" auth="Container" > > > > type="javax.sql.DataSource"/> > > > > > > > > <ResourceParams name="jdbc/sdb-login"> > > > > <parameter> > > > > <name>factory</name> > > > > <value>org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSourceFactory</value> > > > > </parameter> > > > > <parameter> > > > > <name>driverClassName</name> > > > > <value>ca.edbc.jdbc.EdbcDriver</value> > > > > </parameter> > > > > <parameter> > > > > <name>poolPreparedStatements</name> > > > > <value>true</value> > > > > </parameter> > > > > <parameter> > > > > <name>defaultAutoCommit</name> > > > > <value>false</value> > > > > </parameter> > > > > <parameter> > > > > <name>url</name> > > > > <value>jdbc:edbc://localhost:IJ7/sdb</value> > > > > </parameter> > > > > <parameter> > > > > <name>username</name> > > > > <value>tomcat</value> > > > > </parameter> > > > > <parameter> > > > > <name>password</name> > > > > <value>passwd ;-)</value> > > > > </parameter> > > > > <parameter> > > > > <name>initialSize</name> > > > > <value>20</value> > > > > </parameter> > > > > <parameter> > > > > <name>maxActive</name> > > > > <value>0</value> > > > > </parameter> > > > > <parameter> > > > > <name>maxIdle</name> > > > > <value>0</value> > > > > </parameter> > > > > <parameter> > > > > <name>minIdle</name> > > > > <value>20</value> > > > > </parameter> > > > > <parameter> > > > > <name>maxWait</name> > > > > <value>-1</value> > > > > </parameter> > > > > <parameter> > > > > <name>testOnBorrow</name> > > > > <value>false</value> > > > > </parameter> > > > > </ResourceParams> > > > > > > > >Thanks for support, Henrik > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:51:05 -0400 > > > >"Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > >> > > > >> Hi, > > > >> Hmm, with minIdle set to 20 and assuming your test gets one > > > connection > > > >> at a time (or less than 20 at a time), I'm a bit confused. > > > >> > > > >> One next step would be to really verify that the pool has available > > > >> connections before the get connection call. You obviously wouldn't > > > do > > > >> this in a production application, but this is just for debugging a > > > >> performance test. Cast the DataSource to the concrete implementation > > > >> type, probably org.apache.commons.dbcp.BasicDataSource, and call > > > >> getNumIdle on it to verify it's a positive number before calling > > > >> getConnection. If it's zero or negative your pool is misconfigured > > > and > > > >> you're creating a new connection, hence the slow performance. > > > >> > > > >> Yoav Shapira > > > >> Millennium Research Informatics > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> >-----Original Message----- > > > >> >From: Henrik Rathje [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 11:46 AM > > > >> >To: Tomcat Users List > > > >> >Subject: Re: DBCP Performance? > > > >> > > > > >> >Hi, > > > >> >The minIdle value during this test was: > > > >> ><parameter> > > > >> > <name>minIdle</name> > > > >> > <value>20</value> > > > >> ></parameter> > > > >> >any other suggestions? > > > >> >Thanks in advance, Henrik > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> >On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 11:21:08 -0400 > > > >> >"Shapira, Yoav" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Hi, > > > >> >> The initial connections can be closed if idle, depending on your > > > pool > > > >> >> configuration, so you might be creating new connections each time > > > >> even > > > >> >> with the pool. Check your minIdle setting. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> If you're creating a new connection each time, a tiny bit of > > > overhead > > > >> >> can be expected for a pool over a direct DriverManager call. But > > > >> that > > > >> >> defeats the purpose of pooling. If your pool is properly > > > configured > > > >> and > > > >> >> has a connection waiting, it should be a little bit more than a > > > hash > > > >> >> lookup to return the connection, which would be significantly > > > faster > > > >> >> than creating a new one. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> Yoav Shapira > > > >> >> Millennium Research Informatics > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> >-----Original Message----- > > > >> >> >From: Henrik Rathje [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >> >Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 11:16 AM > > > >> >> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >> >Subject: DBCP Performance? > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> >Hi, > > > >> >> >has enyone of you recently measured the performance of the DBCP > > > >> >> >Connection Pool? I compared > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> ><snip> > > > >> >> >long start = System.currentTimeMillis(); > > > >> >> >Class.forName("ca.edbc.jdbc.EdbcDriver"); > > > >> >> >Connection dbcon = DriverManager.getConnection(loginUrl, > > > loginUser, > > > >> >> >loginPa$ > > > >> >> >long diff = System.currentTimeMillis() - start; > > > >> >> >System.out.println("creating connection without pool took: " + > > > diff > > > >> + " > > > >> >> >mil$ > > > >> >> ></snip> > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> >with > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> ><snip> > > > >> >> >long start = System.currentTimeMillis(); > > > >> >> >Connection dbcon = ds.getConnection( ); > > > >> >> >long diff = System.currentTimeMillis() - start; > > > >> >> >System.out.println("creating connection with pool took: " + diff > > > + " > > > >> >> >milise$ > > > >> >> ></snip> > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> >And got surprisingly results like this: > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> >creating connection without pool took: 465 miliseconds > > > >> >> >creating connection with pool took: 585 miliseconds > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> >In my tests the connection pool is always slower, so what did I > > > do > > > >> >> wrong? > > > >> >> >I guess this Parameter is responsible for holding active > > > Connections > > > >> in > > > >> >> >the Pool: > > > >> >> ><parameter> > > > >> >> > <name>initialSize</name> > > > >> >> > <value>20</value> > > > >> >> ></parameter> > > > >> >> >So there shold be active Connections before the getConnection( ) > > > is > > > >> >> >called .. Any ideas? > > > >> >> >Regards, Henrik > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >> >For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business > > > >> >communication, and may contain information that is confidential, > > > >> >proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the > > > >> >individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, > > > >> >printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) > > > >> intended > > > >> >recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer > > > >> system > > > >> >and notify the sender. Thank you. > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >> > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business > > > >communication, and may contain information that is confidential, > > > >proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the > > > >individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, > > > >printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) > > > intended > > > >recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer > > > system > > > >and notify the sender. Thank you. > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business > > > communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary > > > and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom > > > it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by > > > anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately > > > delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
