Hi,

You are right!
that statement should be there!

kind regards,
Luke

On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 06:08, Caroline Jen wrote:
> I saw your Tomcat connection pool class.
> 
> Your class opens and gets a 'conn' object from the
> connection pool.  Where in your code "returns" the
> 'conn' object for use?  Should there be a statemenet
> like:
> 
>      return conn;
> 
> somewhere?
> 
> 1. Declaration of private global variables:
> <code>
>    private Context ctx = null;
>    private DataSource ds = null;
>    private Connection conn;
> </code>
> 
> 2. an init() method:
> <code>
> // "init" does DataSource lookup
>    public void init(ServletConfig config) throws
> ServletException {
>       super.init(config);
>       try {
>          ctx = new InitialContext();
>          if(ctx == null) {
>             throw new Exception("No Context");
>          }
>          ds =
> (DataSource)ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/jdbc/mb");
>       } // end try block
>       catch(Exception e) {
>          e.printStackTrace();
>       }
>    } // end init()
> </code>
> 
> 3. an openConnection() method:
> <code>
>    private void openConnection() {
>       try {
>          if(ds != null) {
>             conn = ds.getConnection();
>             if(conn != null) {
>                message = "Got Connection to DB " +
> conn.toString();
>                }
>             }
>          } // end try block
>       catch(Exception e) {
>          e.printStackTrace();
>          }
>       } //end method openConnection()
> </code>
> 
> 4. a destroy() method that nulls the DataSource:
> <code>
>    public void destroy() {
>    ds = null;
>    }
> </code>
> --- "Luke (Terry) Vanderfluit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Yoav and all,
> > 
> > Thanks for your reply,
> > 
> > > But you went a bit too far: the DataSource lookup
> > is potentially
> > > expensive.  That you can do in the init() method
> > and keep a reference to
> > > the DataSource, because keeping that reference
> > doesn't use a connection
> > > resource.
> > > Then in your servlet methods, get a connection
> > from the DataSource, use
> > > it, and release it.
> > > In your servlet destroy method, null out your
> > DataSource reference. 
> > > So the DataSource lookup is done once, the
> > DataSource reference is kept
> > > as a private non-static member variable of the
> > servlet class, and the
> > > Connenctions are used only within methods, they're
> > not class member
> > > variables.
> > 
> > So now I have changed my code to:
> > 1. Declaration of private global variables:
> > <code>
> >    private Context ctx = null;
> >    private DataSource ds = null;
> >    private Connection conn;
> > </code>
> > 
> > 2. an init() method:
> > <code>
> > // "init" does DataSource lookup
> >    public void init(ServletConfig config) throws
> > ServletException {
> >       super.init(config);
> >       try {
> >          ctx = new InitialContext();
> >          if(ctx == null) {
> >             throw new Exception("No Context");
> >          }
> >          ds =
> > (DataSource)ctx.lookup("java:comp/env/jdbc/mb");
> >       } // end try block
> >       catch(Exception e) {
> >          e.printStackTrace();
> >       }
> >    } // end init()
> > </code>
> > 
> > 3. an openConnection() method:
> > <code>
> >    private void openConnection() {
> >       try {
> >          if(ds != null) {
> >             conn = ds.getConnection();
> >             if(conn != null) {
> >                message = "Got Connection to DB " +
> > conn.toString();
> >                }
> >             }
> >          } // end try block
> >       catch(Exception e) {
> >          e.printStackTrace();
> >          }
> >       } //end method openConnection()
> > </code>
> > 
> > 4. a destroy() method that nulls the DataSource:
> > <code>
> >    public void destroy() {
> >    ds = null;
> >    }
> > </code>
> > 
> > <remarks>
> > -the conn.close() is called in the methods that call
> > openConnection().
> > -I'm thinking of doing an 'include' for the
> > openConnection method, so I
> > don't have the code for the same method sitting in
> > multiple classes.
> > Would that be a good idea? (maintainability, yes but
> > in terms of
> > overhead?)
> > </remarks>
> > 
> > Would this be the 'leanest' scenario for a database
> > connection?
> > thanks again,
> > Luke
> > 
> > -- 
> > ========================
> > Luke (Terry) Vanderfluit 
> > Mobile: 0421 276 282     
> > ========================
> > 
> > 
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
> http://mail.yahoo.com
-- 
========================
Luke (Terry) Vanderfluit 
Mobile: 0421 276 282     
========================


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to