I've been taking a look at the examples provided in the jk2 documentation: http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat/connectors-doc/jk2/jk2/configtcex.html
I was wondering what the pro's and cons are of the following scenarios: 1) "using normal socket" - I would guess that this would be required tomcat isn't on the same machine as apache? 2) "using AF_UNIX socket" - For the cases where tomcat and apache are on the same machine, this seems like it would be the fastest mechanism? What is the difference between 'apr.NativeSo=.../jkjni.so' and 'apr.jniModeSo=.../mod_jk2.so'? Per the last example, "using jni channel class for communication", apr.jniModeSo=inprocess is the default." IIRC, this means that java/tomcat runs within apache, which should increase performance? Any pros and cons to this vs. an out-of-process server that I should be aware of? Thanks for the help. --Kaleb --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
