didn't try 5.0.28 but might upgrade to that soon and if so will test there too
> -----Original Message----- > From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday 12 October 2004 15:10 > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: versions 2.3 and 2.4 of web.xml > > > Hi, > > Seems like a solid report. Post it in Bugzilla (probably to > the Jasper > component). I notice you said 5.0.27: does 5.0.28 work? > > > > Yoav Shapira <http://www.yoavshapira.com/> > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Steve Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 2:50 PM > > >To: 'Tomcat Users List' > > >Subject: RE: versions 2.3 and 2.4 of web.xml > > > > > >Yoav, I have recreated my example. I deleted my installation and > > >reinstalled 5.0.27 from scratch (on win2k / JDK 1.4.2_05). > > > > > >I then added a simple webapp called "test" by adding these > three files > > >under > > >the webapps folder: > > >test\index.jsp > > >test\prelude.jspf > > >test\WEB-INF\web.xml > > > > > >The file contents are as follows (I know that the jsps contain > incomplete > > >HTML but they suffice to keep the example simple). > > > > > >--index.jsp-- > > >========================== > > ><p>This is index.jsp</p> > > >========================== > > > > > >--prelude.jspf-- > > >========================== > > ><p>This is prelude.jspf</p> > > >========================== > > > > > >--web.xml-- > > >========================== > > ><?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?> > > ><!DOCTYPE web-app > > > PUBLIC "-//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Web Application 2.3//EN" > > > "http://java.sun.com/dtd/web-app_2_3.dtd";> > > ><web-app> > > > <jsp-config> > > > <jsp-property-group> > > > <url-pattern>*.jsp</url-pattern> > > > <include-prelude>prelude.jspf</include-prelude> > > > </jsp-property-group> > > > </jsp-config> > > ></web-app> > > >========================== > > > > > >Note that the web.xml above uses the 2.3 DTD. > > >I made no other changes to the standard installation. > > > > > >I then started tomcat (I already have it installed as a service). I > then > > >accessed http://localhost:8080/test/ using IE6. This displayed the > file > > >index.jsp. The browser showed just the text "This is index.jsp". In > other > > >words, no text from prelude.jspf was included even though this is > > >configured > > >in web.xml. No errors were logged in any of the logfiles. > > > > > >As a check, I then stopped tomcat and edited web.xml to give > it the 2.4 > > >headers, deleted all the files from the work directory, then > restarted > > >tomcat and ctrl-F5'd IE to force-reload the page. This > time, the text > from > > >prelude.jspf was included in index.jsp, and no errors were logged. > > > > > >So, as far as I can tell, it seems that the <include-prelude> tag is > being > > >silently ignored when placed in a 2.3 web.xml, but no errors > are being > > >thrown. > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Steve Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> Sent: Thursday 07 October 2004 18:42 > > >> To: 'Tomcat Users List' > > >> Subject: RE: versions 2.3 and 2.4 of web.xml > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Unfortunately I deleted my example once I'd realised what the > > >> problem was. > > >> Like you I don't have time now, but will try to find time > > >> soon to redo it, > > >> and post an example. > > >> > > >> > -----Original Message----- > > >> > From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > Sent: Thursday 07 October 2004 16:43 > > >> > To: Tomcat Users List > > >> > Subject: RE: versions 2.3 and 2.4 of web.xml > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Hi, > > >> > I didn't follow the thread on include-prelude (not my cup > > >> of tea). If > > >> > you can post a web.xml (or better yet, a simple WAR > containing this > > >> > web.xml) that is invalid according to its own declared > DTD and yet > > >> > Tomcat doesn't complain, that'd be great. I don't have time > > >> > to look at > > >> > this now, there are more important issues around, but maybe > > >> > eventually... ;) > > >> > > > >> > Yoav Shapira > > >> > Millennium Research Informatics > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > >-----Original Message----- > > >> > >From: Steve Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > >Sent: Thursday, October 07, 2004 11:27 AM > > >> > >To: 'Tomcat Users List' > > >> > >Subject: RE: versions 2.3 and 2.4 of web.xml > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > >Yoav, I see your point in your previousu post on this thread > > >> > re 2.3 DTD > > >> > >still being valid. However what do you think regarding the > > >> > possible bug > > >> > >mentioned in my later post below? (i.e. that a 2.4 > > >> feature used in a > > >> > 2.3 > > >> > >file does not cause an exception, but instead is silently > ignored). > > >> > The > > >> > >validation that tomcat does on web.xml is usually very thorough, > so > > >> > this > > >> > >case seems to be a bit of an anomaly. > > >> > > > > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> > >> From: Steve Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > >> Sent: Thursday 30 September 2004 18:03 > > >> > >> To: 'Tomcat Users List' > > >> > >> Subject: RE: versions 2.3 and 2.4 of web.xml > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Further to my note below, plus my previous posts on > "Who has got > > >> > >> <include-prelude> to work?", I think I might have stumbled > > >> > across the > > >> > >> answers to both myself. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Basically my web.xml files were based on the v2.3 files that > > >> > >> shipped with > > >> > >> the standard installation, and using these seems to have > > >> > >> silently suppressed > > >> > >> the 2.4 features, including <include-prelude>. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Not sure if this is a bug - if web.xml encounters a tag which > > >> > >> it knows is > > >> > >> valid in its current version, but not in the earlier version > > >> > >> declared in the > > >> > >> <web-app> tag, should an exception be thrown, or should it > > >> > >> silently ignore > > >> > >> it? > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- > > >> > >> > From: Steve Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > >> > Sent: Thursday 30 September 2004 17:32 > > >> > >> > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > > >> > >> > Subject: versions 2.3 and 2.4 of web.xml > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Only just noticed this, looks like a possible bug, but > > >> > >> maybe there's a > > >> > >> > reason behind it? > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > Basically, the default web.xml files included within the > > >> > >> > standard webapps of > > >> > >> > 5.0.27 and 5.0.28 seem to be a mix of webapp v2.3 and v2.4 - > > >> > >> > anyone know if > > >> > >> > there is a reason for this, or is this a bug? > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > > >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > >For additional commands, e-mail: > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential > > >> > business communication, and may contain information that is > > >> > confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is > > >> > intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, > > >> > and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by > > >> > anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, > > >> > please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer > > >> > system and notify the sender. Thank you. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential > business communication, and may contain information that is > confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is > intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, > and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by > anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, > please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer > system and notify the sender. Thank you. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
