Do you mean Apache dont have any security holes. I dont know about hacking a system. But in terms of security Tomcat is far better than Apache since it dont have any security vulnerabilities.
rgds Antony Paul On Thu, 14 Oct 2004 04:41:53 -0400 (EDT), Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > From a security point of view, leaving tomcat hanging out there is one > tier less a malicious person would be faced with hacking...three tiers is > a nice simple security solution. $0.02. > > On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Peng Tuck Kwok wrote: > > > Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 11:59:28 +0800 > > From: Peng Tuck Kwok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > Peng Tuck Kwok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: mod_jk2 Ready/Recommended For Production? > > > > Do you really need to put apache in front of tomcat ? Standalone > > tomcat (since ver 4.x) > > has always been pretty good in terms of performance > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
