Hi > However, here's an interesting/fairly recent thread: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=106036177509367&w=2
30K file: Server #of Samples Average Deviation Median Apache 1000 182ms 277 90 Tomcat 1000 185ms 249 80 And that way 4.1.27, over which 5.x improved! I agree that I should not hide the result for small files (82byte): Server #of Samples Average Deviation Median Apache 1000 17ms 25 10 Tomcat 1000 29ms 44 10 But still 5.x has improved and 82byte files are rare. And remember, that this is the result of pure-apache against pure-tomcat for static files. It is wrong to assume that dynamic files are equally fast comparing tomcat with tomcat/apache. apache/mod_jk add overhead to the process and thus slow down tomcat. And since static files can be cached while dynamic ones cannot, that overhead overhelms the IMHO little speed saving of apache for static files. just my $0,03. Regards, Steffen
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
