Inititally I would have agreed. However, after lots of reading, monkeying around, and working out everything, I can now say that we have implemented successfully the jk2 adapter with both iis5 and apache2 withiout issue. for it to work properly, i found you needed to have virtual-hosts in tomcat .. if you were doing something a bit more complex with multiple hosts.
how many exact pages/traffic do they get? i can't answer that right now. i'll take a look in a bit. haven't noticed any problems though. -alex - pass the salt... On Wed, 29 Sep 2004, Brantley Hobbs wrote: > Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 08:19:53 -0400 > From: Brantley Hobbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Tomcat Users List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: RE: Tomcat 5/Apache 2/JK2- production quality? > > I second this. > > I've had nothing but trouble out of JK2, configuration difficulties on Apache and > just flatly broken on IIS. > > The original JK adapter has worked great. > > -Brantley --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
