distributed locking of session data implies you need something like a distributed cache. If that is the case, maybe you should look at Coherence.
distributed locking is meant to solve a specific problem, so unless you really need to synchronize distributed objects like a distributed cache, I would avoid using it. some people tackle type of problem with JMS. unless you plan to extend TC5 session replication with these features it's going to be a while. peter On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 09:41:41 +0200, LERBSCHER Jean-Pierre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > What are your needs? Why distributed singleton or distributed locking are so > important ? > Perhaps you can use Database to implement locking functionality and Jgroups > library to replicate state (or distributed singleton) across members of a > group (see www.jgroups.org). > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
