that would be the easiest way. but you made it too easy, I thought people are suppose to suffer and stumble :)
peter On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 17:46:51 -0400, Frank W. Zammetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not just let SQL do the update? Do the following: > > update my_table set counter_field = counter_field + 1 (where clause here > if needed) > > (off the top of my head, my syntax might be off) > > In other words, why not let the database handle the concurrency issue? > That's kind of what they're there for (partly anyway). > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
