Ah im in the same boat as you. Though I can get one site working well with mod_jk2 but multiple instances are not working unless I map all extensions using uri in workers2.properties.
How many instances are your running? 1 or multiple? dealing with one is very easy. John > Running Red Hat Fed Core 2, Apache 2.0.51, Tomcat 5.0.x. > > I'm trying to configure Apache and Tomcat like I have countless times > before. The only mod_jk source or binary I can find is for Apache > 2.0.50. If I try to use it with 2.0.51 it's a no-go. > > Since the documentation on mod_jk2 is horrendous, and I've NEVER been > able to properly get it to work, I really would like to continue with > mod_jk without re-installing Apache 2.0.50. > > More disturbingly, I saw this archive email: > > > >Should we see the works on mod_proxy and ajp support in the upcoming > 2.0.51 ? > > > > No, not in 2.0.51 (and to your following question of 2.0.x later > > releases, also likely no.) > http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg22326.html > > So, is mod_jk not being supported with a 2.0.51 version? > > Does anyone have a better option for me? Can anyone show me the Holy > Grail of mod_jk2 properties file documentation? > > Any other options? > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
