I think this is a jdk bug fixed in java 1.4

-----Original Message-----
From: T K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 November 2004 22:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: purported javac memory leak?


Hi all,

as most of you know the tomcat 4.1.x jasper HOW-TO
claims
there is a javac memory leak; is there a SUN bug
report
I can look up? A small test case calling
com.sun.tools.Main.compile()
repeatedly does not exhibit the problem with JDK
1.4.2.
Tomcat 5.x uses the JDT Java compiler - what
was the motivation for doing so? Just so that one
would not need the full JDK?

thanks

/st


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Any opinions expressed in this E-mail may be those of the individual and not 
necessarily the company. This E-mail and any files transmitted with it are 
confidential and solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you are not the 
intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering to the intended recipient, 
be advised that you have received this E-mail in error and that any use or copying is 
strictly prohibited. If you have received this E-mail in error please notify the 
beCogent postmaster at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unless expressly stated, opinions in this email are those of the individual sender and 
not beCogent Ltd. You must take full responsibility for virus checking this email and 
any attachments.
Please note that the content of this email or any of its attachments may contain data 
that falls within the scope of the Data Protection Acts and that you must ensure that 
any handling or processing of such data by you is fully compliant with the terms and 
provisions of the Data Protection Act 1984 and 1998.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to