It depends on your application. The only way you will now for sure will be to upgrade and do lots of testing. There are always bugs in any software - the important issue is do they affect you. If you have the chance to upgrade I would go for the latest stable release which is currently 5.5.4.
Obviously you will have to look at the cost v. benefit of any upgrade and make the decision that is right for you. Mark > -----Original Message----- > From: Vincent Gogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 8:33 PM > To: Tomcat Users List > Subject: RE: multipart/byteranges bug in tomcat 4.1.x > > Thanks. I'll ask for some quick advice. Is it safer (stability wise) > to upgrade to 5.0.x rather than directly to 5.5.x? > > Thanks, > > Vincent > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Thomas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 2:38 PM > > To: 'Tomcat Users List' > > Subject: RE: multipart/byteranges bug in tomcat 4.1.x > > > > > > Fixed in CVS for TC4 but I wouldn't expect a 4.1.32 release for > > some time (New > > Year at the earliest). > > > > Mark > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Shapira, Yoav [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 1:56 PM > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > Subject: RE: multipart/byteranges bug in tomcat 4.1.x > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > Don't hold your breath, upgrade if/when possible. > > > > > > Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com > > > > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > > >From: Vincent Gogan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:09 PM > > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >Subject: multipart/byteranges bug in tomcat 4.1.x > > > > > > > >I had to write some byte-streaming code and it took me > > > >quite a while to find my problem because I had manged to > > > >get my behaviour byte-for-byte identical to Tomcat 4.1.x > > > >behaviour. > > > > > > > >My bug was that I wasn't outputting CRLF before each separator. > > > >The same bug still exists in DefaultServlet.java in > Tomcat 4.1.31. > > > >I checked the 5.0.28 code and the bug was fixed. It might be nice > > > >to fix the old version of Tomcat as it is still quite > heavily used. > > > > > > > >Regards, > > > > > > > >Vincent > > > > > > > > > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential > > > business communication, and may contain information that is > > > confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is > > > intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, > > > and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by > > > anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, > > > please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer > > > system and notify the sender. Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
