Hi, Virtually all of the "more advanced" features from JK2 will be ported (or already have been) into mod_jk, mod_proxy, or both.
Yoav Shapira http://www.yoavshapira.com >-----Original Message----- >From: Nikola Milutinovic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 4:40 AM >To: Tomcat Users List >Subject: Re: which to use: JK2 or JK? > >Ralph Einfeldt wrote: > >> Sorry, but I think you are wrong. >> >> There have been several post in the last days from the >> developers, that clearly say, that there will be no further >> development for mod_jk2. > >This saddens me. I was under th impression that JK2 was more advanced. >What are the reasons for abandoning it? > >The concept of workers, channels and such stuff was great, although it >took some time to grasp. > >> Some features of mod_jk2 will be ported to mod_jk. > >Is there any comprehensive documentation on this? Also, if we are to >drop JK2, will there be an effort made to make comprehensive >documentation on JK1? > >> The other development is mod_proxy_ajp as part of the apache >> webserver project. > >That's for the Apache 2.2. Nice to know, but in the distant future for me. > >Nix. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] This e-mail, including any attachments, is a confidential business communication, and may contain information that is confidential, proprietary and/or privileged. This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) to whom it is addressed, and may not be saved, copied, printed, disclosed or used by anyone else. If you are not the(an) intended recipient, please immediately delete this e-mail from your computer system and notify the sender. Thank you. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
