TomK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dominik -- Regarding your statement that "the latest CVS version does > not suffer from the nasty jar locking." I'll try it out later, but are > you suggesting 5.5.7 will not have JAR locking issues at all, and thus > the antiResourceLocking and antiJARLocking attributes will be > unnecessary??
Well, in my particular case (I have a test app using jstl fmt taglib) I no longer needed antiJARLocking. I have even explicitely set it to false in context.xml. It undeploys now whereas before having the fix applied undeploy failed. cheers /dd --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
