My pages display fine when I'm viewing them locally, but when I go to a local computer training center and view them my HTML tables come out all wrong. Looking at source code shows extra "2000" strings and other random strings in the source. JspISAPI support says that this problem only happens when connecting through one particular proxy server (and an older version at that). However, pages served through JspISAPI will not validate using the W3C's validator (though directly through Tomcat they do). Also my cached pages on Yahoo also display the HTML table problem.
My decision. It's buggy and either no longer supported or poorly supported.
Last week I found a project on sourceforge that does the same thing:
http://iisrelayj.sourceforge.net/
I installed it on a test system. Couldn't get v3 to work but v2 worked. Using this my pages did at least validate using W3Cs validator. They also don't have the random strings when viewing them through a spider simulator. I haven't gotten to the local computer training center to see if my HTML tables are rendering correctly.
At 11:22 AM 3/2/2005, Matt wrote:
I've created a new thread, just in case this got lost in the shuffle... Does anyone know anything about the below "solution" (+ or -) and/or recommend (or not recommend) it?
Thanks, -Matt
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Matt wrote:
> Something else you may want to look into (and I'd LOVE to hear feedback on > from this list?) is the following: > http://jspisapi.neurospeech.com/ > > We are now using this on our production IIS 6 server, mostly due to the > conflciting, or at least the lack of concise and authoratative, docs out > there (and mostly due to timing - this needed to be setup ASAP for a > professor). > I don't directly maintain the IIS 6 server, and its admin got antsy > waiting for us to iron-out the confugration issues (and dreading > future changes taking as much effort, like SSL support) with Tomcat and > went with this instead ($50). > > Was this wise? Anyone? > I'm curious (and not in front of this system now either) if it uses jk2 or > jk and what version, and anything else it may be doing. > > Thanks, > -Matt > > > On Mon, 28 Feb 2005, Fadil wrote: > > > Thanks a lot I'll test this ASAP. > > > > Unfortunately, I must setup IIS6 / Tomcat because it's my production > > environement and I've no choice : I don't want to learn dotnet !! I'm > > a beginner J2EE developper. [snip]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
