I just use the program 'dos2unix'
it rules
-ryan
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Sangeelee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 2:30 AM
Subject: Re: Refresh
> Here's a one liner from the net that will remove the ^M from your configs.
> Remember that a lot of Win editors will put them back in when you save
> (UltraEdit has good support for DOS and Unix files).
>
> perl -pi -e "s/\cM//g" filename
>
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Ryan wrote:
>
> > I use slackware 7.1 and have hacked my smb.conf to pieces.. kinda
> >
> > the best part about using samba is seeing ^M all over the place when you
use
> > vi
> > but yeah I'll try that net command.. learn something new everyday...
> >
> >
> > -ryan
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kevin Sangeelee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 1:28 PM
> > Subject: Re: Refresh
> >
> >
> > > This is true, but it's possible to configure samba to cooperate nicely
> > > with it's native file system. I'm not at work at the moment so I can't
> > > check my files, but I think that rummaging around the docs on
pessimistic
> > > locking gets you close to the issues. I'm currently running
samba/tomcat
> > > on a RH6.2 box with more or less vanilla smb.conf, and it works
perfectly.
> > > The only time I had to reconfigure sambas locking settings (on a
different
> > > box) was when I needed a Unix program to detect write-locks held by a
> > > samba client.
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > > On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Ryan wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Even so.. I've still had to 'touch' half the time. Though I access
my
> > JSP
> > > > > code through windows via samba. Dunno if that has anything to do
with
> > it.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, it absolutely does.
> > > >
> > > > Network file systems often cache directory information about the
files
> > you
> > > > access, in order to avoid lots of network traffic. Thus, a file can
be
> > > > changed on the Samba server (with an updated timestamp), and the
Samba
> > > > client (i.e. the machine Tomcat is running on) does not know that.
> > > >
> > > > IMHO, running your webapps via a network file system (Windows shared
> > > > disks, Samba, Unix NFS, etc.) is not a good idea. You'd be much
better
> > > > off (and have much better performance) if you moved Tomcat to where
the
> > > > files are located, rather than the other way around.
> > >
> >
> >
>
