Peter Lin wrote:
Back in 2002, I wrote several pages using JSP + java and JSP + JSTL to
measure the actual cost of from a performance perspective. The
performance difference isn't noticeable if a page has less than 50
tags. With 200+ tags, the performance difference does range from 2-5x
slower for JSTL. It's worse when you use XML with JSTL. It's also one
of the reasons I like to use JSTL + XML to benchmark. It really gives
the VM a workout.
Awesome! This is great validation.
At least I know I'm not hallucinating :)
The issue is that we have certainly more than 200+ tags... which I'm
not exactly happy about.
The other big performance hit was our use of custom .tag files? I was
able to get a chunk of code form 900ms down to 150ms by replacing the
use of a custom.tag into a jspf include.
Could this be that custom tags aren't using the tag pool?
My profiling showed that a bunch of methods here seemed to be based
around creation.
If necessary I can build up a test case and then profile it.
Kevin
--
Use Rojo (RSS/Atom aggregator)! - visit http://rojo.com.
See irc.freenode.net #rojo if you want to chat.
Rojo is Hiring! - http://www.rojonetworks.com/JobsAtRojo.html
Kevin A. Burton, Location - San Francisco, CA
AIM/YIM - sfburtonator, Web - http://peerfear.org/
GPG fingerprint: 5FB2 F3E2 760E 70A8 6174 D393 E84D 8D04 99F1 4412
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
