i just assumed, which was why i said 'i think'. i offer no guarantees
about anything that comes out of my mouth. ;)
sean
Markus Schönhaber wrote:
Am Montag, 22. August 2005 17:43 schrieb Sean Rowe:
I don't think so. The operating system (i think) encrypts that port as
a standard.
Where did you get that information?
To the OS, a port is a port - regardless of it's number. The only "magic"
regarding port numbers is that Unix-like system only let applications running in the
superuser's context bind to ports with numbers lower than 1024.
Regards
mks
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]