Rainer Jung wrote:
The balanced workers behind lb1, lb2 etc. are allowed to have the same name, because each load balancer has it's own list of balanced workers with associated attributes. I expect no problem from a clash of names of balanced workers in different balancing workers.
I must be missing something obvious here. I am with you on the JKMount part, but I just don't see how the name clash isn't an issue for worker.properties. Simplifying again ...
# as per your suggestion ... where "worker1" and "worker2" are jvmRoutes worker.lb1.balanced_workers=worker1,worker2 worker.lb2.balanced_workers=worker1,worker2 # the balanced workers ... which should they choose ... ? worker.worker1 (failover version) worker.worker1 (not failover version) worker.worker2 (standby version) worker.worker2 (non-standby version) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
