Well, I guess this is a bug in mdb, is better to work with variables and
forget about bugs...that's all...Guido
----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexandre Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 3:49 PM
Subject: Re: JDBC/ODBC: Technological choice
> > Yeah, that is true, for example, with one odbc pointing to and mdb for
> > example you cannot do this: rs.getString(1) and after try to do it
again,
> > you must do TYPE x = rs.get<TYPE>(n); and read x the times you want but
no
> > read a column more than once from Query...
>
>
> That's really bizar... And that sucks. Where does this limitation come
from?
> The driver? Access? Would this alternative syntax:
> String x = getString(String columnName)
> do the same thing? Where could i find a list of these "bugs"/limitations.
> And what about a driver of type IV, would there be the same limitations?
>
> I must confess you that I am a bit discouraged. They wont buy SQL server.
> And they dont want to change neither their damn it NT OS nor their IIS
> server. I am familiar with macosX/BSD+Apache+PHP, but I hoped I could use
> JSP instead of ASP to do the server-side job and to interact with their
> Access db... but I dont like this story of restrictions.
>
> If you want to make someone happy and you already made a successful web
app
> using JSP interacting with an Access Database in a NT environment, please
> conact me !!!
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Otherwise, is there free&efficient alternatives to Acces on NT? mySQL is
> free for all plateform i think, but will the integration with JSP be
easier?
>
> thank you very much guys
>
>
>
>
> >
> > Guido.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Alexandre Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2001 2:46 PM
> > Subject: Re:Re: JDBC/ODBC: Technological choice
>
