Hi again,

          I've yet to try the configs when i get to work today. REALLY hope it 
works. :) , just one other question, what are the benefits of using mod_jk 
instead of "PROXYPASS" ? Surely they created mod_jk for a reason, maybe one 
reason might be it's loadbalancing feature? It's cool to that feature but i 
just want to know the difference in case plan A fails.

You guys have been very helpful,

Paul Tan


Quoting "Chauhan, Anand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:

> wonderful.. seems good.. thanks a bunch. 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Koeninger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Apache and Tomcat on different boxes
> 
> 
> The workers.properties file should be on the Apache machine.  The 
> problem you're running into is that the documentation usually assumes 
> Tomcat and Apache are on the same machine, and it's leading you 
> to believe that workers.properties has something to do with Tomcat.  
> workers.properties is only relevant to mod_jk running on Apache, not 
> to Tomcat.  If you need the example file provided with Tomcat, just copy
> 
> it over to the Apache machine from a distribution of Tomcat and point 
> JkWorkersFile to the right place on the local file system.
> 
> And yes, it does work.  I've run several development and production 
> systems this way.  
> 
> Best Regards,
> 
> Jason Koeninger
> J&J Computer Consulting
> http://www.jjcc.com
> 
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 11:23:07 -0400, Chauhan, Anand wrote:
> 
> >The idea seems great. But how would you access the worker.properties
> file on the remote machine. Or is it that, as suggested, you would be
> "creating" a  worker.properties file in the conf/worker.properties
> >
> >Did the idea work for you ? Let me know. Thanks. 
> >
> >-Andy
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:10 AM
> >To: Jason Koeninger
> >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Apache and Tomcat on different boxes
> >
> >
> >Thks for replying,
> >
> >                   So if i understand you correctly, i have to create
> 
> >a "workers.properties" file in my apache conf dir and have mod_jk look
> for it 
> >there?
> >
> >eg.
> >httpd.conf contains 
> >
> >LoadModule    jk_module  libexec/mod_jk.so
> >AddModule     mod_jk.c
> >
> >JkMount /someurl remotetomcat
> >
> >and 
> >
> >workers.properties file in apache/conf contains:
> >
> >worker.remotetomcat.type=ajp13
> >worker.remotetomcat.port=8009
> >worker.remotetomcat.host=www.x.com
> >worker.remotetomcat.cachesize=30
> >
> >           Is that all i have to do?
> >
> >Thks a Million,
> >Paul
> >
> >
> >
> >Quoting Jason Koeninger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> >> The ip address or hostname of the Tomcat machine is stored 
> >> in the workers.properties file referenced by your mod_jk setup.
> >> I've also seen some sort of url version of the JkMount command, 
> >> but I've never used it myself and don't know if it works or what 
> >> versions it works on.
> >> 
> >> Best Regards,
> >> 
> >> Jason Koeninger
> >> J&J Computer Consulting
> >> http://www.jjcc.com
> >> 
> >> On Wed, 6 Jun 2001 18:29:49 +0800, Paul Tan wrote:
> >> 
> >> >Hi all,
> >> >
> >> >            I tried searching to mailing list b4 posting here.
> Anyway,
> >> what must i put into apache's "http.conf" for 
> >> mod_jk.so to enable a connection to a separate machine containing
> tomcat
> >> 3.2.2? 
> >> >        
> >> >                Placing both the Web Server and App server into 1
> >> machine is rather well documented. But I can't seem 
> >> to find any for separate machines.
> >> >Can someone show me where to fish? or would someone gimme a fish?
> >> >
> >> >Thks,
> >> >Paul
> >> >
> >> 
> >> 
> >> 
> 

Reply via email to